Network performance assessment apparatus, systems, and methods

ABSTRACT

Various embodiments of network performance assessment apparatus, systems and processes collect performance information pertaining to a current capacity utilization of a network, identify an occurrence of a capacity constraint on a portion of the network that is communicating the program to at least one presentation device, and modify at least one characteristic of the program and/or the communication thereof over the network so that a total capacity utilization of the network is less than a peak capacity of the network.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/523,517, filed Jun. 14, 2012, now allowed, which is a continuation ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/778,287, filed Jul. 16, 2007, nowU.S. Pat. No. 8,224,982, which application is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The technical field relates to network performance assessment systemsand methods for audio, video, and/or data content providers and, moreparticularly, to apparatus, systems and methods for communicatinginformation over a network based on the performance of the network.

BRIEF SUMMARY

A system and method for communicating information over a networkperformance assessment system are disclosed. According to oneembodiment, an apparatus comprises a receiver operable to receive a userselection of the program; a network formatter operable to format theselected program into information compatible with a communication formatused by a network, and operable to transmit the formatted program ontothe network; and a network performance assessor operable to assessperformance of the network, operable to determine an occurrence of acapacity constraint on the network, and operable to cause the networkformatter to modify the program communicated over the network to reducecapacity utilization on the network.

Another embodiment is a method comprising collecting performanceinformation pertaining to a current capacity utilization of the network,identifying an occurrence of a capacity constraint on a portion of thenetwork that is communicating the program to a presentation device, andmodifying the program so that a total capacity utilization of thenetwork is less than a peak capacity of the network.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative toeach other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding partsthroughout the several views.

FIG. 1 is an overview block diagram illustrating an exemplarycommunication network.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary customer premisesnetwork in the customer premises in which embodiments of the networkperformance assessor may be implemented

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a networkperformance assessor.

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of relative capacity utilizationrequired by various video formats

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a networkperformance assessor.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a networkperformance assessor.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a process used by an exemplaryembodiment of the network performance assessor.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an alternative process used by anexemplary embodiment of the network performance assessor that isresponsive to a user selection.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is an overview block diagram illustrating an exemplarycommunication network 102 in which an embodiment 100 of the networkperformance assessor 200 (FIG. 2) may be implemented. It is to beappreciated that FIG. 1 is just one example of a communications networkand that the various embodiments discussed herein are not limited tosuch exemplary network. Communication network 102 can include a varietyof communication systems and can use a variety of communication mediaincluding, but not limited to, satellite wireless media.

Television service providers provide their customers a multitude ofaudio/video and/or data programming (hereafter, collectively and/orexclusively “programming” or “program(s)”). Such programming is oftenprovided by use of a receiving device 118 (FIG. 1) communicativelycoupled to a presentation device 120 configured to receive theprogramming.

Receiving device 118 interconnects to a one or more communications mediaor sources (such as a cable head-end, satellite antenna, telephonecompany switch, Ethernet portal, off-air antenna, or the like) thatprovide the programming. The receiving device 118 commonly receives aplurality of programming by way of the communications media or sourcesdescribed in greater detail below. Based upon selection by the user, thereceiving device 118 processes and communicates the selected programmingto the one or more presentation devices 120.

Receiving device 118 may be interchangeably referred to as a “televisionconverter,” “receiver,” “set-top box,” “television receiving device,”“television receiver,” “television recording device,” “satellite set-topbox,” “satellite receiver,” “cable set-top box,” “cable receiver,”and/or “television tuner.” Accordingly, the receiving device 118 may beany suitable converter device or electronic equipment that is operableto receive programming. Further, the receiving device 118 may itselfinclude user interface devices, such as buttons or switches. In manyapplications, a remote 128 is operable to control the presentationdevice 120 and other user devices 122.

Examples of a presentation device 120 include, but are not limited to, atelevision (TV), a personal computer (PC), a sound system receiver, adigital video recorder (DVR), a compact disk (CD) device, game system,or the like. Presentation devices 120 employ a display, one or morespeakers, or other output devices to communicate video and/or audiocontent to a user. In many implementations, one or more presentationdevices 120 reside in or near a customer's premises 116 and arecommunicatively coupled, directly or indirectly, to the receiving device118.

Some customer premises 116 include a network 136, or a networked system,to which receiving devices 118, presentation devices 129, and/or avariety of user devices 122 can be coupled, collectively referred to asendpoint devices. Non-limiting examples of network 136 include, but arenot limited to, an Ethernet, twisted pair Ethernet, an intranet, a localarea network (LAN) system, or the like, One or more endpoint devices,such as PCs, data storage devices, TVs, game systems, sound systemreceivers, Internet connection devices, digital subscriber loop (DSL)devices, wireless LAN, WiFi, Worldwide Interoperability for MicrowaveAccess (WiMax), or the like, are communicatively coupled to network 136so that the plurality of endpoint devices are communicatively coupledtogether. Thus, the network 136 allows the interconnected endpointdevices, and the receiving device 118, to communicate with each other.

The network 136 will commonly have a limiting peak capacity that definesthe maximum amount of information traffic that may be simultaneouslytransmitted over the network 136. The capacity of the network 136 isoften defined by the components of the network 136 which have the lowestcapacity. For example, physical constraints imposed by a coaxial cable(signal attenuation that is a function of cable length and cableimpedance) may be a limiting component of a network 136. As anothernonlimiting example, the switching speed of a switching device may bethe limiting component of network 136.

So long as the total capacity utilization of network 136 is less than orequal to the peak capacity of network 136, operating endpoint deviceswill be able to communicate within their designed information transferrates. The total utilization rate of network 136 corresponds to thetotal amount of information communicated by all endpoint devicesconcurrently communicating over the network 136. However, when the totalutilization rate reaches the above-described peak capacity of thenetwork 136, some or all of the endpoint devices will not be able tocommunicate at their designed information transfer rates. That is,information communication rates between endpoint devices may slow down,some of the communicated information (interchangeably referred to asdata) may be lost or dropped, and/or some endpoint devices may cease totransmit/receive information altogether.

Often, the slow down of information transfer between endpoint devices isof no practical consequence to the user. For example, considerinformation communicated between two non-limiting exemplary endpointdevices, a PC and a data storage device. If information communicationrates between the PC and the storage device decrease, the user may beindifferent if the storage of data requires a little more time thanusual. If information is lost or dropped, inherent redundancy schemesmay detect the lost or dropped information, and then retransmit the lostor dropped information so that all information is eventuallycommunicated between the PC and the data storage device. So long as allinformation is accurately and reliably stored into and/or retrieved fromthe data storage device, the user may be indifferent if the storageand/or retrieval of data requires a little more time than usual.

Interconnecting one or more presentation devices 120 to a receivingdevice 118 via the network 136 is often desirable when the network 136extends throughout the customer premises 116, and the receiving device118 resides at a particular location within the customer premises 116that is remote from the location of one or more presentation devices120. For example, the receiving device 118 may be located where a cableconnection enters a home, while one or more presentation devices 120(e.g., a television) may be located remotely in various rooms of thehome. With a network 136 residing in the home, there is no longer a needto install dedicated cables (e.g., coax, twisted pair or otherwise)throughout the home to provide direct connectivity between the receivingdevices 118 and the presentation devices 120 or user devices 122. Nor isthere a limitation that the presentation devices 120 or user devices 122be inconveniently located in close proximity to the receiving device118. Rather, interconnectivity is provided via the network 136.

When one or more presentation devices 120 are communicatively coupled toa receiving device 116 via a network 136, the user is able to viewselected programming on a real-time basis so long as the capacityutilization (total amount of information traffic) over the network 136is less than or equal to the peak capacity of the network 136. However,when capacity utilization attempts to exceed the capacity of the network136, information transfer rates may decrease, and/or information (data)may be lost or dropped. For example, undesirable image pixilation mayoccur, or undesirable distortion of the images may become apparent tothe viewer. Such situations are generally viewed as intolerable undercurrent industry standards. That is, a viewer expects that they will beable to view a sharp, clear, and undistorted video image on their TV atall times.

Accordingly, the various embodiments disclosed herein, whether usedsingularly or in combination, facilitate the communication ofprogramming received by one or more receiving devices 118 to one or morepresentation devices 120 or user devices 122, via the network 136.Desirably, but not necessarily, the various embodiments change or modifyat least one characteristic of the program, such as the communication ofaudio, video and/or data information, communicated to presentationdevices 120 so that the audio and/or video information is presented atdesired quality and/or quantity levels.

A. Communication Network Overview

A plurality of content providers 104 a-104 i provide program content toa distributor, such as the program distributor 106. Exemplary contentproviders 104 a-104 i can include, but are not limited to, televisionstations providing local or national television programming, specialcontent providers providing premium based programming or pay-per-viewprogramming, radio stations providing audio programming, interactivecontent providers or the like.

Program content, interchangeably referred to as a program, iscommunicated to the program distributor 106 from the content providers104 a-104 i through suitable communication media, generally illustratedas communication system 108. Communication system 108 may include manydifferent types of communication media, now known or later developed.Non-limiting media examples include telephony systems, the Internet,internets, cable networks, fiber optic networks, microwave networks,asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) systems, frame relay networks, digitalsubscriber loop (DSL) systems, radio frequency (RF) networks, andsatellite systems. Further, program content communicated from thecontent providers 104 a-104 i to the program distributor 106 may becommunicated over combinations of media. For example, a televisionbroadcast station may initially communicate program content, via an RFsignal or other suitable medium, that is received and then convertedinto a digital signal suitable for transmission to the programdistributor 106 over a fiber optics network. As another nonlimitingexample, an audio content provider may communicate audio content via itsown satellite system to the program distributor 106.

The received program content is converted by one or more devices (notshown) as necessary at the program distributor 106 into a suitablesignal that is communicated (i.e.; “uplinked”) by one or more antennas110 to one or more satellites 112 (separately illustrated herein from,although considered part of, the communication system 108). It is to beappreciated that the communicated uplink signal may contain a pluralityof multiplexed programs. The uplink signal is received by the satellite112 and then communicated (i.e., “downlinked”) from the satellite 112 inone or more directions, for example, onto a predefined portion of theplanet. It is appreciated that the format of the above-described signalsare adapted as necessary during the various stages of communication.

A receiver antenna 114 that is within reception range of the downlinksignal communicated from satellite 112 receives the above-describeddownlink signal. A wide variety of receiver antennae 114 are available.Some types of receiver antennae 114 are operable to receive signals froma single satellite 112. Other types of receiver antennae 114 areoperable to receive signals from multiple satellites 112.

The receiver antenna 114 can be located at a customer premises 116.Examples of customer premises 116 include a residence, a business, orany other suitable location operable to receive signals from satellite112. The received signal is communicated, typically over a hard-wireconnection, to a receiving device 118. Receiving device is a conversiondevice that converts, also refereed to as formatting, the receivedsignal from antenna 114 into a signal suitable for communication to apresentation device 120 and/or a user device 122. Often, the receiverantenna 114 is of a parabolic shape that may be mounted on the side orroof of a structure. Other antenna configurations can include, but arenot limited to, phased arrays, wands, or other dishes.

The received signal communicated from the receiver antenna 114 to thereceiving device 118 is a relatively weak signal that is amplified, andprocessed or formatted, by the receiving device 118. The amplified andprocessed signal is then communicated from the receiving device 118 to apresentation device 120 in a suitable format, such as a television (TV)or the like, and/or to a user device 122. It is to be appreciated thatpresentation device 120 may be any suitable device operable to present aprogram having video information and/or audio information.

User device 122 may be any suitable device that is operable to receive asignal from the receiving device 118, another endpoint device, or fromother devices external to the customer premises 116. Additionalnon-limiting examples of user device 122 include optical mediarecorders, such as a compact disk (CD) recorder, a digital versatiledisc or digital video disc (DVD) recorder, a digital video recorder(DVR), or a personal video recorder (PVR). User device 122 may alsoinclude game devices, magnetic tape type recorders, RF transceivers, andpersonal computers (PCs).

Interface between the receiving device 118 and a user (not shown) may beprovided by a hand-held remote device 128. Remote 128 typicallycommunicates with the receiving device 118 using a suitable wirelessmedium, such as infrared (IR), RF, or the like. Other devices (notshown) may also be communicatively coupled to the receiving device 118so as to provide user instructions. Non-limiting examples include gamedevice controllers.

The receiving device 118 may receive content partially from, or entirelyfrom, another source other than the above-described receiver antenna114. Other embodiments of the receiving device 118 may receive locallybroadcast RF signals, or may be coupled to communication system 108 viaany suitable medium. Non-limiting examples of medium communicativelycoupling the receiving device 118 to communication system 108 includecable, fiber optic, or Internet media.

Some embodiments may employ an intermediary device 130 tocommunicatively couple the receiving device 118 to the network 136.Other embodiments are configured to directly couple to network 136, andare described in greater detail below.

It is appreciated that it is not practical to list or describe hereinall of the possible types of receiving devices 118, presentation devices120, user devices 122, remotes 128, intermediary devices 130, or theirequivalents. Further, it is appreciated that it is not practical to listor describe herein all of the possible types of interconnectivity and/orforms of media by which a receiving device 118 may receive programcontent. However, all such possible devices, types of interconnectivity,and media forms are intended to be included within the scope of thisdisclosure. Examples of such devices, types of interconnectivity, and/ormedia forms are further described in greater detail hereinbelow.

Customer premises 116 may include other devices which arecommunicatively coupled to communication system 108 via a suitablemedia. For example, personal computer (PC) 132 may be communicativelycoupled to the communication system 108 via the network 136.Alternatively, devices in the customer premises 116 may be directlyconnected to the communication system 108, such as the telephone 134which may employ a hardwire connection or an RF signal for coupling tocommunication system 108.

A plurality of information providers 138 a-138 i are coupled tocommunication system 108. Information providers 138 a-138 i may providevarious forms of content and/or services to the various devices residingin the customer premises 116. For example, information provider 138 amay provide requested information of interest to PC 132. Informationproviders 138 a-138 i may further perform various transactions, such aswhen a user purchases a product or service via their PC 132.

The above description of the communication network 102, and the variousdevices therein, is intended as a broad, non-limiting overview of anexemplary environment in which various embodiments of the networkperformance assessor 200 (FIG. 2) may be implemented in. Thecommunication network 102, and the various devices therein, may containother devices, systems and/or media not specifically described herein.

B. Customer Premises Network Overview

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary network 136 residingin the customer premises 116 in which embodiments of the networkperformance assessor 200 may be implemented. As noted above,non-limiting examples of the network 136 may include an intranet system,a local access network (LAN) system, an Ethernet system, a cable system,a radio frequency system, a cellular system, or a hybrid systemcomprised of multiple types of communication media. The network 136 isany multi-point communication network operable to communicateinformation between devices or systems communicatively coupled to thenetwork 136.

A plurality of presentation devices 120 and/or user devices 122 may bedirectly and/or indirectly coupled to the network 136. In this exemplaryimplementation of the network performance assessor 200, a plurality ofpresentation devices 120 a-120 i, a PC 132, and a variety of userdevices 122 a-122 i are understood to be communicatively coupled to thereceiving device 118 and the communication system 108 (FIG. 1) over thenetwork 136. Here, information such as program content may becommunicated to the plurality of presentation devices 120 a-120 i anduser devices 122 a-122 i via the communication system 108, such as asatellite system. Presentation devices 120 a-120 i, PC 132 and/or userdevices 122 a-122 i, may be interchangeably referred to as endpointdevices when communicatively coupled to the network 136.

The network 136 includes a modem/server 202 and a backbone 204. Theserver/modem 202 is an endpoint device or system operable tocommunicatively couple the network 136 to the communication system 108.A non-limiting example of server/modem 202 is a dial-up phone modemoperable to couple the network 136 to a telephony system. Anothernon-limiting example is a digital subscriber loop (DSL) modem coupled tothe network 136 to a DSL system. Another non-limiting example is a cablemodem, fiber optic modem, or the like, operable to couple the network136 to a cable system.

Modem/server 202 is operable to receive information communicated to itfrom selected endpoint devices coupled to the network 136, is operableto convert the received information into a format compatible with thecommunication system 108, and is operable to transmit the re-formattedinformation to the communication system 108. Conversely, modem/server202 is operable to receive information communicated to it from thecommunication system 108, is operable to convert the receivedinformation into a format compatible with the network 136, and isoperable to transmit the re-formatted information to selected endpointdevices coupled to the network 136.

The backbone 204 is referred to herein to be the physical topology ofthe network 136 which communicatively couples the various endpointdevices via a suitable connector or medium, generally denoted byreference numeral 206. Exemplary topologies include bus, ring, star, orswitched topologies. Connectors 206 may be any physical structure orcombinations thereof connecting presentation devices 118, user devices120, and/or other endpoint devices. Examples of connectors 206 include,but are not limited to, a hard wire connection, a bus, a cable, or afiber optics cable. Switching devices may even be used as part of thephysical structure of the network 136. Further, connectors 206 may benon-physical structures, such as, but not limited to an RF media or anIR media.

A plurality of presentation devices 120 a-120 i, a PC 132, user devices122 a-122 i, and a receiving device 118 are non-limiting illustratedexamples of devices that can be communicatively coupled to the network136. It is appreciated that it is not convenient to list or describeherein all of the possible forms of devices, systems and/or media of thenetwork 136 and/or the communication network 102. That is, there arepractically limitless combinations of devices which may becommunicatively coupled directly or indirectly to the backbone 204.

Further, intermediary devices may be coupled between the backbone 204and endpoint devices, such as, but not limited to, presentation device120 a-120 i. For example, presentation device 120 b is illustrated ascommunicatively coupled to the backbone 204 via a network switch 208 anda secondary receiving device (RD) 210. Here, it is appreciated that theformat of information communicated over the network 136 to the networkswitch 208 is packet based with headers identifying destination endpointdevices (and/or intermediary devices). Accordingly, the network switch208 monitors communication traffic over the network 136, and acceptsinformation that is directed to the presentation device 120 b, receivingdevice 210, or the network switch 208 in this example. The acceptedinformation, depending on the format of the information and thecorresponding format of the receiving device 210 and/or presentationdevice 120 b, may be re-formatted by the network switch 208, by thereceiving device 210, and/or by the presentation device 120 b such thatthe communicated information is communicated to a viewer (viewed andlistened to on the presentation device 120 b).

As another example, presentation device 120 i is illustrated ascommunicatively coupled to the backbone 204 via a wireless access point212 and an RF receiving device (RD) 214. Here, it is appreciated thatthe format of information communicated over the network 136, directed tothe destination presentation device 120 i, is received by the wirelessaccess point 212. The received information is converted into a wirelessRF signal, communicated to the RF receiving device 214, and then isreceived and converted by the RF receiving device 214 into a signal thatis compatible with presentation device 120 i, such that the communicatedinformation is communicated to a viewer (viewed and listened to on thepresentation device 120 i). RF receiving device 214 may be a single unitoperable to directly receive RF signals, or may be a combination ofdevices acting in concert to receive RF signals.

Embodiments of receiving device 118 may include a signal processingsystem 216, an optional memory 218, a receiver 220, and a networkformatter 222. A port 224 may be provided to physically couple thereceiving device 118 to the network 136 via a suitable connector 206.Alternatively, the receiving device 118 may be communicatively coupledto the network 136 via a wireless media, such as, but not limited to, RFor infrared media.

The signal processing system 216, optional memory 218, receiver 220,and/or network formatter 222 as described herein may denote one or morecomponents or devices operating in concert to perform a describedfunctionality. The components may reside together as a single unit, ormay be distributed through the receiving device 118 in convenientinternal locations, or may even be external to the receiving device 118.

The signal processing system 216 receives information from the receiverantenna 114, which receives satellite signals from one or moresatellites 112 (FIG. 1). The signal processing 216 also receives a userselection signal generated, for example, by the remote 126, via thereceiver 220. A user selection signal may specify one or more channelsor some other information of interest. Based upon the user selectionsignal, signal processing system 216 generates information (video and/oraudio) corresponding to the selected channels or other selectedinformation (e.g.; a program guide or movie selection menu). The signalprocessing system 216 may perform various transcode, decode, encode andother types of operations. The information is generated from thereceived signals and/or from information residing in memory module 218.

The generated information is communicated to the network formatter 222.Network formatter 222 converts and formats the received information intoan information signal that is in a format compatible with the network136. In some embodiments, the network formatter 222 may change selectionof programming to a different format communicated to the receivingdevice 118. This formatted information signal is communicated over thenetwork 136 to one or more of the presentation devices 120 a-120 i orother endpoint devices. Network formatter 222 may be a stand-alonedevice in some embodiments, or, may be integrated into or with otherdevices of the receiving device 118 in other embodiments. Networkformatter 222 may also include other functionality not described herein.

In the exemplary system illustrated in FIG. 2, the program may becommunicated over the network 136 to a first presentation device 120 a.Here, if the network 136 is a packet-based communication system that maybe internet protocol (IP) compatible, the presentation device 120 a isan IP compatible TV with an input port operable to receive the programas IP formatted information. Thus, this presentation device 120 a is atype of endpoint device since it has an address or the like identifyingitself such that the program communicated to it by the receiving device118 may identify the presentation device 120 a as the destinationdevice.

In the exemplary system illustrated in FIG. 2, the same program, or adifferent program, may be communicated from the receiving device 118(additionally or alternatively) over the network 136 to a secondpresentation device 120 b. The information may be received bypresentation device 120 b via intermediary devices, the network switch208 and the receiving device 210. Similarly, the same or differentprogram communicated from the receiving device 118 may be additionallyor alternatively communicated over the network 136 to a thirdpresentation device 120 i. The program is received by presentationdevice 120 i via intermediary devices, the wireless access point 212 andthe RF set-top box 214.

Connectivity between the above-described elements of FIG. 2 areillustrated as single hard-wire connectors. Other embodiments may employmultiple hard-wire connectors, may employ optical based connectors, mayemploy wireless media connections, may employ a communication bus, mayemploy combinations of connector/connection types, or may employproprietary or third party networks. It is appreciated that it is notpractical to list or describe herein all of the possible types or formsof connectors/connections. However, all such possibleconnectors/connections, now known or later developed, are intended to beincluded within the scope of this disclosure.

C. Customer Premises Network Capacity Constraints

Some networks 136 have a fixed capacity, and other networks 136 may beexpandable. However, at any given point in time, it is appreciated thatthe network 136 has a limited capacity to handle a maximum amount ofinformation transfer, interchangeably referred to as communicationtraffic.

Peak capacity corresponds to the maximum amount of information that canbe reliably transmitted by the network 136, either instantaneously orover some predefined period of time, and is interchangeably referred toherein as the “peak capacity” of the customer premise network 136. Peakcapacity may be an amount of discrete program information, such as, butnot limited to, digital data, communicated over a period of time in adigitally-based communication format. In other networks 136, peakcapacity may be a bandwidth of an analog-based communication format.

Peak capacity of the network 136 may be predetermined or defined in avariety of manners. For example, peak capacity may be expressed in termsof the maximum amount of information, or data, that may be transmittedover a unit of time, interchangeably referred to as a maximum transferrate. Peak capacity may be expressed as bits-per-second (bps), kilobitsper second (kbps), megabits per second (mbps), or the like.

As noted above, peak capacity defines a maximum amount of communicationtraffic that the network 136 can accommodate without degradation of thecommunicated information, such a program communicated form receivingdevice 118 to presentation device 120. If one or more of the endpointdevices attempt to communicate information at a time when capacity ofthe network 136 is already fully utilized, or if the incrementally addedamount of communication traffic added by the endpoint devices increasescapacity utilization up to the peak capacity, various undesirableconsequences may occur depending upon the nature of the network 136 andthe operating endpoint devices. When endpoint devices attempt tocommunicate over a premises network 136 that is already fully utilized,or the incrementally added amount of communication traffic that would beadded by the endpoint devices increases, capacity utilization of thenetwork 136 increase up to the peak capacity. Accordingly, a capacityconstraint condition exists over the network 136.

During a capacity constraint condition, portions of, or all of,transmitted information (data) communicated by some types of endpointdevices may be lost or dropped when the amount of the informationtraffic reaches the capacity of the network 136. In other situations,the speed of the communication of the information between endpointdevices over the network 136 may be slowed down or otherwise delayed.That is, transmission of information between endpoint devices may beperformed over a greater period of time, and/or, communicated at a latertime.

In the case of program information, any lost or dropped information(data), or delays in the speed of information communication, may resultin a viewer perceiving an undesirable distortion of the displayed imageand/or may result in missing portions of the displayed image duringviewing of the program on their presentation device 120. It isappreciated that the various manifestations of problems encountered in anetwork 136 when endpoint devices attempt to communicate information inexcess of peak capacity may varied and are too numerous to be describedherein. However, all such manifestation of such problems encountered areintended to be included within the scope of this disclosure.

As a non-limiting illustrative example, consider a situation where someof the endpoint devices illustrated in FIG. 2 are operating, eachutilizing a portion of the available capacity of the network 136. Forexample, the PC 132 may be in communication with a remote internet sitevia modem/server 202 and the communication system 108. Also, the PC 132may be communicating information to the user device 122 a, such as whenthe user device 122 a is a printer. The communication of information bythe PC 132 to the Internet and to the printer over the backbone 204 willutilize a portion of the available capacity of the network 136.

Continuing with the illustrative example, a user may then turn onpresentation device 120 b to watch a program in standard definitionformat. The program may be provided from either receiving device 118 orcommunication system 108. Accordingly, more information traffic is addedonto the backbone 204. Further, the network switch 208 is transmittinginformation to the presentation device 120 b, via receiving device 210.

At some point, information traffic of a plurality of currently operatingendpoint devices, or information traffic from a newly-operating endpointdevice, may cause the amount of, and accordingly the rate of,information transmission to reach the peak capacity of the backbone 204of the network 136. For example, consider the situation where a viewer(not shown) turns on presentation device 120 a to view a program in ahigh-definition (HD) format. Or, consider the situation where theviewer, via instructions made via the remote 126, instructs thereceiving device 118 to communicate two HD program channels topresentation device 120 a in a picture-on-picture (POP) format or apicture-in-picture (PIP) format.

In this example, assume that the information traffic over the backbone204 of the network 136 reaches its peak capacity as a result of theabove-described additional information communicated to the presentationdevice 120 a. Thus, some endpoint devices may have to accept a slow downin the rate of its information communication over the network 136, ormay have to re-transmit lost information (data) over the network 136 ata later time. In the case of a PC 132 communicating with an internetsite, the apparent slowdown of the performance of the PC 132 may not beperceptible, or if perceptible, may still be tolerable to the user. Forexample, printing a document may take a bit longer than usual, ordisplayed pages on the PC 132 may take a bit longer to update.

However, a loss of video information and/or a slow down in the rate ofvideo information communicated to the presentation device 120 a and/or120 b may not be acceptable to the viewer watching the program on apresentation device 120. That is, the resultant image distortion of thedisplayed image on presentation device 120 is readily perceptible by aviewer viewing the program.

The network performance assessor 200, upon determining that theinformation traffic over the backbone 204 of the network 136 is at ornear peak capacity, acts to modify the amount of, or rate of,information communicated over the backbone 204 of the network 136.Accordingly, the viewer of the presentation device 120 perceives displayof the selected program at a sufficiently acceptable viewing quality.

Embodiments of the network performance assessor 200 may monitor and/orstore performance information pertaining to a current capacityutilization of the network 136. When current capacity nears the maximumcapacity, embodiments may identify or anticipate an occurrence of acapacity constraint on a portion of the customer premises network thatis communicating the channel of video information to a video displaydevice. In response, embodiments of the network performance assessor 200modify at least an amount of video information communicated over thenetwork 136 so that the video information is communicated over thenetwork 136 operating at a total capacity utilization that is at leastless than the peak capacity of the network 136. Other embodiments maymodify the rate at which information is communicated over the network136.

D. Network Performance Assessment System

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a networkperformance assessor 200. The exemplary network performance assessor 200includes input/output 302, performance analysis logic 304, controller306, and optional processing unit 308. The input/output 302 is operableto receive information corresponding to the current utilization ofcapacity of the network 136 and/or of other devices coupled to thenetwork 136, including paths of interest between endpoint devices orwithin the network 136. For example, but not limited to, performanceinformation can be provided from a remote presentation device 120 basedon the quality of the received program. The performance analysis logic304 is executed so that the processing unit 308 may process the receivedperformance information, described in greater detail below, from thenetwork 136. The performance analysis logic 304 is configured to enablethe processing unit 308 to analyze the received performance informationto assess the current performance of the network 136 (and/or the otherdevices).

When performance analysis logic 304 may be implemented as software andstored in any suitable memory or data storage device, or, may beimplemented as firmware or hardware or a combination thereof. It is tobe appreciated that performance analysis logic 304 can be stored on anycomputer-readable medium for use by or in connection with any computerand/or processor related system or method. In the context of thisdocument, the memory may be a computer-readable medium that is anelectronic, magnetic, optical, or other another physical device or meansthat contains or stores a computer and/or processor program. Performanceanalysis logic 304 can be embodied in any computer-readable medium foruse by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus,or device, such as a computer-based system, processor-containing system,or other system that can fetch the instructions from the instructionexecution system, apparatus, or device and execute the instructionsassociated with performance analysis logic 304. In the context of thisspecification, a “computer-readable medium” can be any means that canstore, communicate, propagate, or transport the program associated withperformance analysis logic 304 for use by or in connection with theinstruction execution system, apparatus, and/or device. Thecomputer-readable medium can be, for example, but is not limited to, anelectronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, orsemiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. Morespecific examples (a nonexhaustive list) of the computer-readable mediumwould include the following: an electrical connection having one or morewires, a portable computer diskette (magnetic, compact flash card,secure digital, or the like), a random access memory (RAM), a read-onlymemory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM, EEPROM,or Flash memory), an optical fiber, and a portable compact discread-only memory (CDROM). Note that the computer-readable medium, couldeven be paper or another suitable medium upon which the programassociated with logic 908 is printed, as the program can beelectronically captured, via for instance optical scanning of the paperor other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in asuitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in the suitable memory orcoded in firmware.

In situations where the network 136, and/or other devices coupled to thenetwork 136, are operating at or near their respective peak capacities,the processing unit 308, executing the performance analysis logic 304,determines the occurrence of the capacity constraint condition andnotifies the controller 306. That is, the performance analysis logic 304enables the processing unit 308 to determine that the capacity of thenetwork 136 is fully utilized.

A capacity constraint condition is indicative of a likelihood thatinformation communicated to one or more presentation devices 120, suchas a TV, may be subject to a delay or loss of video information suchthat an undesirable display of currently viewed programming is likely.In one embodiment, controller 306 generates a signal that instructs thesignal processing system 216 (FIG. 2) to automatically adjust at leastthe video information that is being communicated to a television.

As noted above, input/output 302 is operable to receive informationcorresponding to the current total capacity utilization of the network136 and/or other endpoint devices coupled to the network 136. In theexemplary system illustrated in FIG. 1, the performance information,data, or the like, is received from the network formatter 222. Forexample, test information may be communicated from the network formatter222, based upon instructions or information received from the networkperformance assessor 200, to the other devices coupled to the network136. In other embodiments, the performance information may be receivedfrom any suitable source, such as a special device (not shown) residingin the network 136 and/or from the endpoint devices coupled to thenetwork 136.

Any suitable information corresponding to performance of the network 136(such as the backbone 204), endpoint devices, and/or intermediarydevices coupled to the network 136 (such as the network switch 204,receiving device 210, wireless access point, PC 132, and/or user device122) may be provided as performance information to the input/output 302.For example, throughput between two endpoint devices under a given aspecific set of conditions, such as transmission protocol (e.g.; TCP orUDP), host hardware (e.g.; processor speed, bus speed, NIC speed),operating system, system settings (e.g.; TCP buffer size, txqueuelensetting), may be used as the performance information. Other non-limitingexamples of performance information may include one way delay (OWD) timetaken for a packet to travel from a source, such as the networkformatter 222, to a destination endpoint device, such as presentationdevice 120 a, may be used as performance information. Alternatively,round Trip Time (RTT), the time to travel from the source to thedestination endpoint device and back, may be used as performanceinformation. The fraction of packets lost between network element A andB may be used as performance information. The loss may be measured in aone way or round trip direction. It is appreciated that many differentways to obtain performance information, and characteristics ofperformance information, are possible. Examples of performanceinformation, and obtaining such performance information, are describedin greater detail in “A Hierarchy of Network Performance Characteristicsfor Grid Applications and Services,” Network Measurements Working Group,Jun. 19, 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein in itsentirety. All such possible forms of performance information, now knownor later developed, are intended to be included within the scope of thisdisclosure.

The executed performance analysis logic 304 is operable to enable thereceiving device 118 to receive information corresponding to theperformance information received at the input/output 302. As notedabove, the performance analysis logic 304 enables the processing unit308 to determine the occurrence of a capacity constraint on the network136 based upon the received performance information.

In response to determining the occurrence of a capacity constraintoccurring on the network 136, the processing unit 308 executingperformance analysis logic 304 indicates the capacity constraint to thecontroller 306. In embodiments where the magnitude or seriousness of thecapacity constraint is determinable, such information may also becommunicated to the controller 306.

Controller 306, in response to receiving the indication of the capacityconstraint (and/or receiving information indicative of the magnitude orseriousness of the capacity constraint), automatically communicatesinstructions to the signal processing system 216 to take a selectedaction. In some embodiments, the selected action adjusts thetransmission of at least video information to one or more operatingpresentation devices 120 such that utilized capacity over the network136 is reduced to below the peak capacity of the network 136.Accordingly, the program signal (at least the video information)communicated from the receiving device 118 (FIG. 2) is communicated toan operating presentation device 120 at a rate that is not subject toloss or delay.

The above-described input/output 302, performance analysis logic 304,processing unit 308, and controller 306 are generally described in termsof functionality. It is appreciated that the actual implementation ofmodules 302, 306, and logic 304, may be readily made using knowncomponents, devices, and/or systems. For example, the input/output 302,performance analysis logic 304, processing unit 308, and controller 306,may be implemented as firmware, or a combination of hardware andfirmware. When implemented as hardware, the input/output 302,performance analysis logic 304, processing unit 308, and controller 306,may be constructed with commonly available components well known in theart. For example, but not limited to, a state machine (not shown) may beused and implemented as a suitable configuration of transistors on anintegrated circuit (IC) chip. Alternatively, the functionality ofinput/output 302, performance analysis logic 304, processing unit 308,and controller 306 may be implemented as software executable by aprocessing system or the like.

E. Adjusting the Communicated Program Signal

As noted above, some embodiments of the network performance module 200(FIGS. 2 and 3) cause the receiving device 118 to automatically take aselected action, such as reducing an amount of at least videoinformation to one or more operating TVs, thereby modifying totalcapacity utilization over the network 136. Accordingly, the programsignal (at least the video information) communicated from the receivingdevice 118 is communicated at a rate that is not subject to loss and/ordelay.

In one embodiment, format of a communicated program is changed from anHD format to a standard definition format. A program in HD formatutilizes a relatively large amount of capacity of the network 136. Aprogram in standard definition format utilizes a relatively smaller ofcapacity of the network 136. Since a program presented in a standarddefinition format provides an acceptable quality image when displayed ona presentation device 120, it is assumed that it will be preferred bythe user to receive the selected program of interest presented in thestandard definition format (rather that presented in an otherwisedistorted HD format).

In some embodiments, the receiving device 118 is operable to display thesame or multiple HD channels to multiple presentation devices 120, or todisplay multiple HD channels to a single presentation device 120. Inresponse to the occurrence of a capacity constraint in the network 136,the receiving device 118 may selectively switch one or more of the HDchannels to the standard definition format. If a single presentationdevice 120 is initially receiving two HD channels displayed in POP orPIP mode, the receiving device 118 may selectively switch one or more ofthe HD channels to the standard definition format, or terminate displayof one of the channels. In another embodiment, if multiple presentationdevices 120 are receiving different program channels (where eachcommunicated program channel utilizes a portion of the availablecapacity of the network 136), one of the program channels may beselected and communicated to the multiple presentation devices 120 (suchthat only the communicated program channel utilizes a portion of theavailable capacity of the network 136).

In other embodiments, the communicated program channel may beselectively modified such that the program channel is communicated tothe presentation device 120 in a format and/or resolution that requiresless capacity. Many different formats and/or resolutions of videoinformation of a program are available to communicate over the network136. For example, if the program channel is initially communicated in anMPEG-2 (Moving Pictures Expert Group) format, the format may be changedto an MPEG-4 format in response to the occurrence of a capacityconstraint in the network 136. It is appreciated that it is notpractical to list or describe herein all of the possible formats and/orresolutions used in communicating video information. However, all suchpossible formats and/or resolutions are intended to be included withinthe scope of this disclosure.

Some embodiments may be operably to adjust the rate of communication offrames to the presentation device 120, particularly if the presentationdevice has a buffer, memory device, or the like, operable to temporarilystore portions of the received program as they are communicated to itover the network 136. That is, receiving device 118 may decrease therate at which the program is communicated to the presentation device 120so long as the portion of previously received program is buffered andcan be used to maintain the continuity of the presentation of theprogram on the presentation device 120.

Various operator selectable functions are known for controlling view ofa selected program. These user selectable features, commonly known as“trick” modes or functions, include, but are not limited to, fastforward, slow motion, reverse motion, stop motion, or the like.Providing such trick modes or features uses capacity of the network 136.Disabling these “trick” modes or functions results in a reducedutilization of capacity in response to the occurrence of a capacityconstraint in the network 136.

The manner in which the programming channel is communicated to thepresentation device 120 may also be modified. For example, programmingmay be provided as video transfer only (no streaming), streaming only,or streaming and transfer. Upon occurrence of the capacity constraint onnetwork 136, these functions may be altered to a function that requiresless capacity in response to the occurrence of a capacity constraint inthe network 136.

Supplemental services may be provided by the receiving device 118, suchas, but not limited to, Internet services and/or voice services (phoneservice provided under a Voice Over Internet Protocol, or VOIP). Thesesupplemental services may be altered to a function or format thatrequires less capacity, or may even be terminated, to modify (increaseor reduce) capacity utilization over the network 136 in response to theoccurrence of a capacity constraint in the network 136.

Some embodiments may be operable to modify, and thus format, the amountof video information communicated from the set-top box 116 in a tieredfashion. Further, selection of the adjustment may be based upon thenature or magnitude of the determined capacity constraint. For example,FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of relative capacity utilizationrequired by various video formats. It is apparent that a single programcommunicated as a single standard definition (SD) stream with no trickmode support requires the least amount of utilized capacity on thenetwork 136. On the other hand, multiple programs communicated as amultiple high definition (HD) streams with trick mode support requires amuch greater amount of utilized capacity on the network 136. It isappreciated that the illustrated order of the program modes illustratedin FIG. 4 is exemplary, and actual capacity utilization requirements ofthe various program modes may vary depending upon the actualtechnologies applied in the system.

In embodiments operable to modify a program format, or change programstransmitted from the set-top box 116, in a tiered fashion, thecontroller 306 may assess the initial nature of the program communicatedfrom the receiving device 118 to the presentation devices 120 a-120 i.The controller 306 may then determine an amount of required capacityutilization modification necessary to reduce total capacity utilizationover the network 136. Next, the controller 306 may determine anadjustment to the nature of the program communicated to from thereceiving device 118 to the presentation devices 120 a-120 i that issufficient to modify the communicated program so that the level, amount,or rate of communicated data over network 136 is changed to a level,amount, or rate that reduces total capacity utilization over the network136. The modification may further be based upon a threshold or otherpredefined amount of capacity utilization over the network 136 known toprovide adequate capacity for communication of programming from thereceiving device 118. In some embodiments, peak capacity of the network136 may be defined by a threshold capacity or other predefined capacity.

Further, the adjustments may be made in a tiered fashion among aplurality of operating presentation devices 120. For example, contentcommunicated to a primary designated presentation device 120 may remainunchanged, while the program communicated to another presentation device120 may be modified to reduce capacity utilization over the network 136.Programming may even be halted to the other presentation device 120.

In some embodiments where adjustments are made in a tiered fashion, apriority system may be used to prioritize selection of the actions takenin response to an occurrence of a constraint. That is, some embodimentsof the network performance assessor 200 may prioritize selection ofprogram formats to implement a capacity utilization modification(increase or reduction) over the network 136.

In some embodiments, a connection port or the like is available that maybe communicatively coupled to other endpoint devices coupled to thenetwork 136. Thus, some embodiments of the network performance assessor200 may issue control signals to the other endpoint devices, orintermediary devices, to change operation of the endpoint devices,thereby modifying capacity utilization over the network 136. Forexample, if communicatively coupled to a printer, the networkperformance assessor 200 may slow down, postpone, or even halt printingoperations to increase capacity for communication of programming fromthe receiving device 118. If communicatively coupled to PC 132, thenetwork performance assessor 200 may slow down or even haltcommunications with the Internet to increase capacity for communicationof programming from the receiving device 118. If communicatively coupledto the wireless access point 212, the communication characteristics ofthe wireless signal may be modified, or even halted, to increasecapacity for communication of programming from the receiving device 118.

F. Other Embodiments

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a networkperformance assessment system 500. In this embodiment, the networkformatter 222 is a separate device residing outside of the receivingdevice 118. Thus, network formatter 222 is configured to communicateover the network 136 that it is coupled to. This embodiment may beconfigured to communicatively couple the receiving device 118 to anytype of network 136 through the configured network formatter 222.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a networkperformance assessment system 600. In this embodiment, the networkperformance assessor 200 is a separate device residing outside of thereceiving device 118. Thus, receiving device 118 may communicativelycoupled to the network performance assessor 200, where the networkperformance assessor 200 is operable to communicate over the particulartype of network 136 that it is coupled to. The network performanceassessor 200 may be configured to receive performance informationindependently from the particular configuration of the receiving device118.

Receiving device 118 was described and illustrated as receiving programcontent via receiver antenna 114 receiving signals from satellite 110(FIG. 1). Other embodiments may receive program content from anysuitable sources and/or media. Such sources and media may include cableor fiber optic networks, ATM networks, or DSL systems. Wireless networkssuch as RF or microwave may also provide programs to the receivingdevice 118.

Embodiments may periodically monitor capacity utilization of the network136, or monitor on a real-time basis. The above-described embodimentsare responsive to occurrence of instances where total capacityutilization of the network 136 reaches its peak capacity.

Embodiments may act in response to instances where total capacityutilization of the network 136 reaches a predefined or thresholdcapacity (that has been defined as the peak capacity). For example, athreshold capacity of 80% of the maximum peak capacity of the network136 may be predefined as the peak capacity. It may be further known thatan initiation of a communication of a single HD format program channelto a presentation device 120 may utilize 25% of the available capacityof the network 136. Accordingly, if the set-top box communicated the HDformat program to the presentation device 120, capacity utilization ofthe network 136 will reach its peak capacity (defined as the predefinedor threshold capacity).

In the above-described situation, the network performance assessor 200would act in a proactive manner to maintain capacity utilization of thenetwork 136 at or below its peak capacity. Various actions are possible.For example, the selected program may be provided in a standarddefinition format. The format of the data may be changed (e.g.; fromMPEG-4 to MPEG-2). Or another endpoint device may be affected (e.g.;ceasing connectivity of a PC to the Internet or stopping/delaying aprint job sent to a printer). Any possible action described herein, orcombination of actions, may be effected in a pro-active manner tomaintain capacity utilization of the network 136 at or below its peakcapacity. Thus, a viewer would not have to view a distorted image on thepresentation device 120 while waiting for the network performanceassessor 200 to perform a correction.

Embodiments may interactively or dynamically adjust the amount ofinformation communicated over the network 136. For example, but notlimited to, the format and/or resolution of the video information may bechanged on a real time, near real time, or periodic basis to adjust theamount of information communicated over the network 136. Changes may bemade on a discrete basis (changing between MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 formats,etc.), or may be made on a scaling basis (change the resolution of theimage, change the size of the image, etc.).

Audio information may also be modified. For example, but not limited to,multiple channel audio of a surround sound format may be modified into astereo channel or even a mono channel audio format. Such changes to thecharacteristics of the audio information may not be readily perceptibleto the viewer.

Further, embodiments may act in response a total capacity utilization ofthe network 136 reaching peak capacity based upon a predefined orthreshold capacity, and accordingly, provide a margin of error or thelike. That is, the predefined or threshold capacity may provide asufficient amount of margin to accommodate short term fluctuations incapacity utilization caused by the operating endpoint devices. Forexample, communication of data from a PC to a remote memory, via thenetwork 136, may use capacity from time-to-time on the network 136. Thisfluctuating capacity utilization may, if the network 136 is operating ator near its peak capacity, cause the above-described problems in thetransmission of programming content form the receiving device 118 to thepresentation device 120. Thus, the network performance assessor 200 mayact to keep total capacity utilization of the network performanceassessor 200 at or below the predefined or threshold capacity duringsuch short term fluctuations in capacity utilization.

In various embodiments, the predefined or threshold capacity may be avariable parameter. That is, the amount of capacity difference betweenthe predefined or threshold capacity and the network 136 may vary. Forinstance, capacity difference between the predefined or thresholdcapacity and the peak capacity of the network 136 may be such that thereis sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate communication of two HDprogram channels to at least one presentation device 120. If only one HDchannel is currently being communicated to a presentation device 120,the predefined or threshold capacity may be changed to reflect acurrently available amount of available capacity.

Memory module 218 may have sufficient memory capacity for informationstorage. The network performance assessor 200 may save or storeinformation pertaining to the received performance information and/orpertaining to the actions taken to modify (increase or reduce) capacityutilization. This information may be later retrieved for analysis and/orreporting. This information may be very desirable when assessing currentand future capacity requirements of the network 136 (or selectedcomponent therein). In some situations, the owner of the network 136 mayelect to upgrade their facilities or purchase premium or valued addedservices after analyzing the saved performance information and/or theactions taken to modify (increase or reduce) capacity utilization.

Embodiments may be operable to communicate the detection of theoccurrence of a capacity constraint to a user so that the userunderstands the reason for the perceptible distortion in their viewedimage. The user may further be shown a menu 226 (FIG. 2) or the likewith selectable options available for modifying capacity utilization onthe network 136. The network performance assessor 200 may be configuredto change program formats from HD to standard definition, change anMPEG-4 to an MPEG-2 or MPEG-1 format, eliminate trick modes or features,or even change operation of other endpoint devices to implement acapacity utilization modification. Menu 226 or the like may be displayedto the user such that the user is able to interactively select apreferred action that the network performance assessor 200 will take tomodify capacity utilization on the network 136.

Embodiments may be operable to take actions to increase the capacityutilization of the network 136 as additional capacity becomes availableon the network 136. For example, the network performance assessor 200may change the program from a standard definition program format to anHD program format, may change the program received standard definitionprogram format to corresponding program received in a HD program format,add trick modes or features, or even change operation of other endpointdevices to implement a capacity utilization increase. A menu or the likemay be displayed to the user such that the user is able to select apreferred action that the network performance assessor 200 will initiateto increase capacity utilization on the network 136.

Embodiments of receiving device 118 may reside in, be integrated with,or other wise be included in or with a presentation device 120. Suchhybrid systems may be coupled to the network 136 such that programs maybe communicated to other remote presentation devices 120 via the network136.

Embodiments of presentation devices 120, user devices 122, modem server202, or other remote devices coupled to network 136 may have a networkperformance assessor 200 implemented therein such that network capacityutilization may be monitored and such that instructions can be providedto the receiving device 118 so that programs are modified to increase ordecrease capacity utilization on the network 136. For example, but notlimited to, a modem server 202 embodiment may monitor traffic over itsrespective network 136, and if the maximum amount of information trafficthat may be simultaneously transmitted over the network 136 is reached,or substantially reached, the modem server 202 may communicateinstructions to receiving device 118 so as to modify the programcommunicated over the network 136 to reduce capacity utilization on thenetwork 136. The instructions may take any of a variety of forms. Anamount of capacity reduction/increase, type of program change, or thelike could be specified to the receiving device 118. Or, the receivingdevice 118 may itself, in response to receiving a request or the like,select the appropriate action to decrease or increase capacityutilization on the network 136 in response to receiving an instructionor the like from the presentation devices 120, user devices 122, modemserver 202, or other remote devices.

Programs may be configured to facilitate the adjustment of capacityutilization over the network 136. For example, an advertising program ora movie may be generated in a first format that utilizes a first amountof capacity, and generated in a second format that utilizes a lesseramount of capacity. Accordingly, embodiments may select which programformat is communicated to the presentation device 120 based upon thecurrent traffic over the network 136.

Embodiments of the receiving device 118 may be communicating the programto a presentation device 120 having a buffer, memory or the like suchthat received programming is temporarily stored, processed, and thenpresented on the presentation device 120. In the event of a capacityconstraint, the embodiment may decrease the rate at which frames ofvideo information of the program are communicated to the presentationdevice 120, which simply decreases the amount of the program that isbuffered or stored prior to presentation.

FIGS. 7 and 8 are a flowcharts 700 and 800, respectively, illustratingprocesses used by an embodiment of a network performance assessor 200(FIG. 2). In this regard, each described process may represent a module,segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executableinstructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). Itshould also be noted that in some implementations, the functions notedin the process may occur in a different order, may include additionalfunctions, may occur concurrently, and/or may be omitted.

With respect to FIG. 7, the process 700 is ongoing with operation of thereceiving device 118 (FIG. 1), and is illustrated as starting at 702. At704, performance information is collected pertaining to a currentcapacity utilization of a network. At 706, an occurrence of a capacityconstraint is identified on a portion of the network that iscommunicating the program to a presentation device. At 708, the programis modified so that a total capacity utilization of the network is lessthan a peak capacity of the network. The process ends at 710.

With respect to FIG. 8, the process 800 is ongoing with operation of thereceiving device 118 (FIG. 1), and is illustrated as starting at 802. At804, performance information is collected pertaining to a currentcapacity utilization of the network. At 806, an occurrence of a capacityconstraint is identified on a portion of the network that iscommunicating the program to a presentation device. At 808, a selectionof at least one user selectable option is communicated to the display,each user selectable option corresponding to a different manner ofadjusting the communication of the program. At 810, a user selection ofone of the user selectable options is received. At 812, the program ismodified so that a total capacity utilization of the network is lessthan a peak capacity of the network. The process ends at 814.

It is to be appreciated that the network 136 may be implemented in avariety of manners. For example, but not limited to, the network 136 maybe implemented by communicatively coupling the receiving device 118 andthe network performance assessor 200 to the network 136. As describedhereinabove, the network performance assessor 200 is operable to assessperformance of the network 136, operable to determine an occurrence of acapacity constraint on the network 136, and operable to cause thereceiving device 118 to modify the program communicated over the network136 to reduce capacity utilization on the network 136. As describedhereinabove, the receiving device 118 and the network performanceassessor 200 may be implemented as a single device or separatelyimplemented. If separately implemented, the receiving device 118 and thenetwork performance assessor 200 may be coupled to the network atdifferent locations.

While various embodiments have been described hereinabove, it is to beappreciated that various changes in form and detail may be made withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope of the invention(s) presently orhereafter claimed.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A network method, comprising: coupling areceiving device to a network, the network having coupled thereto aplurality of endpoint devices; processing with the receiving device afirst stream of real-time programming from a first source; concurrent tothe processing of the first stream, processing with the receiving devicea second stream of real-time programming from a second source, thesecond source different from the first source; formatting with thereceiving device a portion of the first stream of real-time programmingfor presentation on a first endpoint device; formatting with thereceiving device a portion of the second stream of real-time programmingfor presentation on a second endpoint device, wherein the portions ofthe first and second streams are formatted such that a current capacityutilization of the network will remain below a peak capacity thresholdof the network when the formatted portions of the first and secondstreams are communicated on the network as first and second data streamsrespectively, the current capacity utilization of the network being asummation of a bandwidth of each data stream of a plurality of datastreams respectively allocated to the network; communicating theformatted portion of the first stream of real-time programming on thenetwork as one of the plurality of data streams allocated to thenetwork; and communicating the formatted portion of the second stream ofreal-time programming on the network as another one of the plurality ofdata streams allocated to the network.
 2. The network method of claim 1,comprising: reformatting with the receiving device a second portion ofthe second stream of real-time programming for presentation on thesecond endpoint device, wherein the second portion of the second streamis reformatted such that an updated current capacity utilization of thenetwork will remain below the peak capacity threshold of the networkwhen the reformatted second portion of the second stream is communicatedon the network, the reformatted second portion of the second streamconsuming more bandwidth than the portion of the second streampreviously formatted.
 3. The network method of claim 1 wherein the firstendpoint device is different from the second endpoint device.
 4. Thenetwork method of claim 1 wherein the first endpoint device is atelevision arranged to receive information via an Internet protocol (IP)compatible input port.
 5. The network method of claim 1 wherein thefirst endpoint device is a game system.
 6. The network method of claim 1wherein formatting with the receiving device the portion of the firststream of real-time programming or formatting with the receiving devicethe portion of the second stream of real-time programming includesmaking a selection between modifying an amount of information to becommunicated or a rate of information to be communicated.
 7. The networkmethod of claim 1 wherein formatting with the receiving device theportion of the first stream of real-time programming or formatting withthe receiving device the portion of the second stream of real-timeprogramming includes modifying a resolution of a displayable image to becommunicated.
 8. The network method of claim 1 wherein the first sourceis a local storage device.
 9. A receiving device, comprising: a networkinterface, the network interface arranged to couple the receiving deviceto a network having coupled thereto a plurality of endpoint devices; asignal processing module operable to process a first stream of real-timeprogramming communicated from a first source and operable toconcurrently process a second stream of real-time programming from asecond source; a network performance assessor operable to determine acurrent capacity utilization of the network, the current capacityutilization of the network being a summation of a bandwidth of each datastream of a plurality of data streams respectively allocated to thenetwork; and a network formatter operable to format a portion of thefirst stream of real-time programming for communication over the networkto a first endpoint device and operable to format a portion of thesecond stream of real-time programming for communication over thenetwork to a second endpoint device, the portions of the first andsecond streams formatted such that a summation of the current capacityutilization of the network and a bandwidth consumed by communicating theportions of the first and second streams over the network is below apeak capacity threshold of the network.
 10. The receiving device ofclaim 9 wherein the first source is different from the second source.11. The receiving device of claim 9 wherein the first source and thesecond source are a same source and wherein the first and second streamsof real-time programming are streams of programming multiplexed into acommon signal from the same source.
 12. The receiving device of claim 9wherein the network formatter is operable detect that the summation isbelow the peak capacity threshold of the network before at least one ofthe first and second streams is formatted.
 13. The receiving device ofclaim 9 wherein the network formatter is operable detect that thesummation has exceeded the peak capacity threshold of the network afterat least one of the first and second streams is formatted.
 14. Thereceiving device of claim 9, comprising: an input port arranged toreceive user input that directs at least one operation of the networkformatter.
 15. A networked system, comprising: at least one presentationdevice coupled to a network; a receiving device coupled to the network;a signal processing module operable to process a first stream ofreal-time programming communicated on the network and operable toconcurrently process a second stream of real-time programmingcommunicated on the network; a network performance assessor operable todetermine a current capacity utilization of the network, the currentcapacity utilization of the network being a summation of a bandwidth ofeach data stream of a plurality of data streams respectively allocatedto the network; and a network formatter operable to format a portion ofthe first stream of real-time programming for communication over thenetwork to a first presentation device and operable to format a portionof the second stream of real-time programming for communication over thenetwork to a second presentation device, the portions of the first andsecond streams formatted such that a summation of the current capacityutilization of the network and a bandwidth consumed by communicating theportions of the first and second streams over the network is below apeak capacity threshold of the network.
 16. The networked system ofclaim 15 wherein the receiving device is operable to communicate theformatted first stream of real-time programming over the network to thefirst presentation device and wherein the receiving device is operableto communicate the second stream of real-time programming over thenetwork to the second presentation device.
 17. The networked system ofclaim 15 wherein the first presentation device and the secondpresentation device are arranged in a single user device.
 18. Thenetworked system of claim 15 wherein the at least one presentationdevice is a television arranged to receive information via an Internetprotocol (IP) compatible input port.
 19. The networked system of claim15 wherein the at least one presentation device is a gaming device. 20.The networked system of claim 15 wherein the receiving device isarranged to receive the first stream of real-time programming or thesecond stream of real-time programming from a networked storage device.